🔗 Share this article

Twelve months back, the landscape was utterly distinct. Before the US presidential election, reflective residents could admit America's significant faults – its unfairness and imbalance – yet they continued to identify it as the US. A democratic nation. A country where legal governance meant something. A nation guided by a honorable and ethical official, despite his advanced age and growing weakness.

Currently, this autumn, countless Americans barely recognize the land we reside in. People suspected of being unauthorized foreigners are detained and shoved into transport, at times blocked from fair treatment. The eastern section of the “people’s house” – is being torn down for a grotesque ballroom. The leader is harassing his political rivals or alleged foes and requesting legal authorities surrender an enormous amount of citizen dollars. Uniformed troops are deployed across metropolitan centers on false pretexts. The Pentagon, renamed the War Department, has practically rid itself of routine media oversight while it uses possibly reaching nearly $1tn in public funds. Institutions, law firms, journalism organizations are yielding due to presidential intimidation, and rich magnates are regarded as members of the royal family.

“The United States, just months before its quarter-millennium anniversary as the globe's top democratic nation, has crossed the edge toward dictatorship and extremism,” Garrett Graff, wrote this past summer. “Finally, swifter than I believed likely, it did happen here.”

One awakes amid recent atrocities. And it's challenging to understand – and distressing to accept – just how far gone we are, and the rapid pace with which it occurred.

However, we understand that the leader was duly elected. Even after his profoundly alarming previous administration and despite the warnings that came with the awareness of Project 2025 – following the president personally declared plainly he planned to rule as a tyrant only on the first day – sufficient voters elected him over Kamala Harris.

While alarming as the current reality are, it's more daunting to recognize that we’re only three-quarters of a year into this presidential term. Where will another 36 months of this deterioration find us? And what if that period becomes a more extended duration, since there is nobody to stop this president from opting that another term is necessary, possibly for national security reasons?

Certainly, there is still hope. There are congressional elections the coming year that could bring a different balance of power, should Democrats recapture the Senate or House of the legislature. There exist elected officials who are striving to impose certain responsibility, for example Democratic congressmen who are initiating an inquiry concerning the try to cash appropriation by federal prosecutors.

And a national vote in 2028 could initiate us down the road to recovery precisely as last year’s election put us on this regrettable path.

We see millions of Americans demonstrating in the streets of their cities, as they did in the past days in the No Kings rallies.

An ex-cabinet member, wrote recently that “the slumbering force of America is stirring”, exactly as before following the Red Scare in that decade or during the sixties activism or throughout the Watergate scandal.

On those occasions, the unstable nation eventually was righted.

He claims he recognizes the signs of that revival and notices it unfolding now. For proof, he points to the recent massive protests, the extensive, bipartisan pushback against a television host's removal and the near-unanimous defiance by media to sign military mandates they report only approved content.

“The dormant force consistently stays asleep until specific greed grows too toxic, an specific act so contemptuous toward public welfare, certain violence so disruptive, that he is forced but to awaken.”

It's a positive outlook, and I appreciate the author's seasoned opinion. Perhaps he will turn out correct.

Meanwhile, the major inquiries endure: is the US able to return to normalcy? Can it reclaim its status internationally and its devotion to the rule of law?

Or should we recognize that the historical project succeeded temporarily, and then – swiftly, totally – ended?

My negative thoughts tells me that the final scenario is true; that everything could be lost. My optimistic spirit, however, tells me that we must try, by any means we can.

Personally, as a media critic, that involves encouraging reporters to live up, more completely, to their mission of scrutinizing authority. For different individuals, it may be working on election efforts, or organizing rallies, or finding ways to defend voting rights.

Less than a year ago, we lived in an alternate reality. A year from now? Or three years from now? The fact is, we cannot predict. Our sole course is to attempt to persevere.

What’s Giving Me Hope Now

The contact I encounter during teaching with aspiring reporters, who are equally visionary and grounded, {always